THE BILL ITSELF
HB 1141
Military Installations and Ranges
1
A bill to be entitled
2
An act relating to military installations and ranges;
3
amending s. 11.242, F.S.; providing a duty of the
4
Office of Legislative Services; amending s. 163.3175,
5
F.S.; revising legislative findings; revising
6
provisions relating to the exchange of certain
7
information between local governments and military
8
installations and ranges; creating part V of ch. 252,
9
F.S., entitled "Military Community Resiliency";
10
creating s. 252.951, F.S.; providing legislative
11
findings and intent; creating s. 252.952, F.S.;
12
providing definitions; creating s. 252.953, F.S.;
13
providing for a prioritized scoring adjustment;
14
creating s. 252.954, F.S.; requiring a department to
15
consider certain factors in applying the prioritized
16
scoring adjustment; creating s. 252.955, F.S.;
17
requiring publication of a revised prioritized scoring
18
adjustment by a specified date; creating s. 252.956,
19
F.S.; requiring the Division of Emergency Management
20
to coordinate interagency implementation; requiring
21
the division to submit an annual report to the
22
Governor and Legislature by a specified date; creating
23
s. 252.957, F.S.; providing for stakeholder
24
coordination; creating s. 252.958, F.S.; authorizing
25
rulemaking; providing an effective date.
27
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
29
Section 1. Subsection (1) of section 11.242, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
31
11.242 Powers, duties, and functions as to statutory
32
revision.—The powers, duties, and functions of the Office of
33
Legislative Services in the operation and maintenance of a
34
statutory revision program shall be as follows:
35
(1) To conduct a systematic and continuing study of the
36
statutes and laws of this state for the purpose of reducing
37
their number and bulk;, removing inconsistencies, redundancies,
38
and unnecessary repetitions and otherwise improving their
39
clarity and facilitating their correct and proper
40
interpretation; and ensuring that military compatibility is
41
examined as provided in s. 163.3175; and for the same purpose,
42
to prepare and submit to the Legislature reviser's bills and
43
bills for the amendment, consolidation, revision, repeal, or
44
other alterations or changes in any general statute or laws or
45
parts thereof of a general nature and application of the
46
preceding session or sessions which may appear to be subject to
47
revision. Any revision, either complete, partial, or topical,
48
prepared for submission to the Legislature shall be accompanied
49
by revision and history notes relating to the same, showing the
50
changes made therein and the reason for such recommended change.
51
Section 2. Section 163.3175, Florida Statutes, is amended
52
to read:
53
163.3175 Legislative findings on compatibility of
54
development with military installations and ranges; exchange of
55
information between local governments and military installations
56
and ranges.—
57
(1) The Legislature finds that incompatible development on
58
of land and in state-controlled waters or on state submerged
59
lands close to military installations and ranges can adversely
60
affect the ability of such an installation or range to carry out
61
its mission. The Legislature further finds that such development
62
also threatens the public safety because of the possibility of
63
accidents occurring within the areas surrounding a military
64
installation or range. In addition, the economic vitality of a
65
community is affected when military operations and missions must
66
relocate because of incompatible urban encroachment. Therefore,
67
the Legislature finds that effective coordination among it
68
desirable for the local governments, state departments, the
69
state land planning agency, and military installations and
70
ranges is desirable in the state to cooperate with military
71
installations to encourage compatible land use and activities in
72
state-controlled waters or on state submerged lands to, help
73
prevent incompatible encroachment, and facilitate the continued
74
presence of major military installations and ranges in this
75
state.
76
(2) Certain major military installations and ranges, due
77
to their mission and activities, have a greater potential for
78
experiencing compatibility and coordination issues than others.
79
Consequently, this section and s. 163.3177(6)(a), relating to
80
compatibility of land development with military installations
81
and ranges, apply to specific affected local governments in
82
proximity to and in association with specific military
83
installations and ranges, as follows:
84
(a) Avon Park Air Force Range, associated with Highlands,
85
Okeechobee, Osceola, and Polk Counties and Avon Park, Sebring,
86
and Frostproof.
87
(b) Camp Blanding, associated with Clay, Bradford, and
88
Putnam Counties.
89
(c) Eglin Air Force Base and Hurlburt Field, associated
90
with Gulf, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, and Walton Counties and Cinco
91
Bayou, Crestview, Destin, DeFuniak Springs, Fort Walton Beach,
92
Freeport, Laurel Hill, Mary Esther, Niceville, Shalimar, and
93
Valparaiso.
94
(d) Homestead Air Reserve Base, associated with Miami-Dade
95
County and Homestead.
96
(e) Jacksonville Training Range Complex, associated with
97
Lake, Marion, Putnam, and Volusia Counties.
98
(f) MacDill Air Force Base, associated with Hillsborough
99
County and Tampa.
100
(g) Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Marine Corps Support
101
Facility-Blount Island, and outlying landing field Whitehouse,
102
and the Florida Air National Guard, associated with Duval
103
County, Jacksonville Port Authority, and Jacksonville.
104
(h) Naval Air Station Key West, including various annexes
105
across Boca Chica Key and Key West as well as the Fleming
106
Bay/Patton Water Drop Zone training range used by the Army
107
Special Forces Underwater Operations School, associated with
108
Monroe County and Key West.
109
(i) Naval Support Activity Orlando, including Bugg Spring
110
and Naval Ordnance Test Unit, associated with Orange, Brevard,
111
and Lake Counties, County and Orlando, Canaveral Port Authority,
112
and Okahumpka.
113
(j) Naval Support Activity Panama City, associated with
114
Bay County, Panama City, and Panama City Beach.
115
(k) Naval Air Station Pensacola, associated with Escambia
116
County.
117
(l) Naval Air Station Whiting Field and its outlying
118
landing fields, associated with Santa Rosa and Escambia
119
Counties.
120
(m) Naval Station Mayport, associated with Duval County,
121
Atlantic Beach, and Jacksonville.
122
(n) Patrick Space Force Base and Cape Canaveral Space
123
Force Station, associated with Brevard County, Canaveral Port
124
Authority, and Satellite Beach.
125
(o) Tyndall Air Force Base, associated with Bay County,
126
and Mexico Beach, and Parker.
127
(p) United States Southern Command, associated with Miami-
128
Dade County and Doral.
129
(q) South Florida Ocean Measurement Facility, associated
130
with Broward County and Dania Beach.
131
(r) United States Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville,
132
including Station Mayport, Station Port Canaveral, Station Ponce
133
de Leon Inlet, Aids to Navigation Team Jacksonville Beach, and
134
Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron (HITRON), associated
135
with Duval, Brevard, and Volusia Counties and Jacksonville,
136
Jacksonville Beach, Atlantic Beach, Canaveral Port Authority,
137
and New Smyrna Beach.
138
(s) United States Coast Guard Sector Miami, including Base
139
Miami Beach, Station Fort Lauderdale, Station Fort Pierce, Air
140
Station Miami, Station Lake Worth Inlet, and Civil Engineering
141
Unit Miami, associated with St. Lucie, Palm Beach, Broward, and
142
Miami-Dade Counties and Fort Pierce, Riviera Beach, Dania Beach,
143
Opa-locka, Miami, and Miami Beach.
144
(t) United States Coast Guard Sector Key West, including
145
Station Key West, Station Islamorada, and Station Marathon,
146
associated with Monroe County and Key West, Islamorada, and
147
Marathon.
148
(u) United States Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg,
149
including Station St. Petersburg, Air Station Clearwater,
150
Station Cortez, Station Fort Myers Beach, Station Sand Key, and
151
Station Yankeetown, associated with Pinellas, Manatee, Lee, and
152
Levy Counties and St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Cortez, Fort Myers
153
Beach, and Yankeetown.
154
(v) United States Coast Guard Sector Mobile, including
155
Station Panama City, Station Destin, and Station Pensacola,
156
associated with Bay, Okaloosa, and Escambia Counties and Panama
157
City, Destin, and Pensacola.
158
(3) The direct-support organization created in s. 288.987
159
may recommend to the Legislature changes to the military
160
installations and ranges and local governments specified in
161
subsection (2) based on a military base or range's base's
162
potential for impacts from encroachment, and incompatible land
163
uses and development.
164
(4) Each affected local government must transmit to the
165
commanding officer of the relevant associated installation or
166
range or installations information relating to proposed changes
167
to comprehensive plans, plan amendments, and proposed changes to
168
land development regulations which, if approved, would affect
169
the intensity, density, or use of the land adjacent to or in
170
close proximity to the military installation or range. At the
171
request of the commanding officer, affected local governments
172
must also transmit to the commanding officer copies of
173
applications for development orders requesting a variance or
174
waiver from height or lighting restrictions or noise attenuation
175
reduction requirements within areas defined in the local
176
government's comprehensive plan as being in a zone of influence
177
of the military installation or range. Each affected local
178
government shall provide the military installation or range
179
control military authority an opportunity to review and comment
180
on the proposed changes.
181
(5) The commanding officer or his or her designee may
182
provide advisory comments to the affected local government on
183
the impact such proposed changes may have on the mission of the
184
military installation or range. Such advisory comments shall be
185
based on appropriate data and analyses provided with the
186
comments and may include:
187
(a) If the installation has an airfield or range, whether
188
such proposed changes will be incompatible with the safety and
189
noise standards contained in the Air Installation Compatible Use
190
Zone (AICUZ) or the Range Air Installation Compatible Use Zone
191
(RAICUZ) adopted by the military installation for that airfield
192
or range.;
193
(b) Whether such changes are incompatible with the
194
Installation Environmental Noise Management Program (IENMP) of
195
the United States Army.;
196
(c) Whether such changes are incompatible with the
197
findings of a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS), a Compatible Use Plan
198
Study, an Acoustic Buffer Zone, an Explosive Safety Quantity
199
Distance (ESQD) arc, a Military Influence Overlay District
200
(MIOD), a Military Influence Planning Area (MIPA), and a
201
Military Installation Complex Encroachment Management Action
202
Plan (ICEMAP), or a Military Installation Readiness Review
203
(MIRR) for the area if one has been completed.; and
204
(d) Whether the military installation or range's
205
installation's mission will be adversely affected by the
206
proposed actions of the county, or affected local government, or
207
controlling authority.
209
The commanding officer's comments, underlying studies, and
210
reports shall be considered by the local government in the same
211
manner as the comments received from other reviewing agencies
212
pursuant to s. 163.3184.
213
(6) The affected local government shall take into
214
consideration any comments and accompanying data and analyses
215
provided by the commanding officer or his or her designee
216
pursuant to subsection (4) as they relate to the strategic
217
mission of the base, public safety, and the economic vitality
218
associated with the base's operations, while also respecting
219
private property rights and not being unduly restrictive on
220
those rights. The affected local government shall forward a copy
221
of any comments regarding comprehensive plan amendments to the
222
state land planning agency.
223
(7) To facilitate the exchange of information provided for
224
in this section, a representative of a military installation or
225
range acting on behalf of all military installations and ranges
226
within that jurisdiction shall serve ex officio as a nonvoting
227
member of the county's or affected local government's land
228
planning or zoning board. The representative is not required to
229
file a statement of financial interest pursuant to s. 112.3145
230
solely due to his or her service on the county's or affected
231
local government's land planning or zoning board.
232
(8) The commanding officer is encouraged to provide
233
information about any community planning assistance grants that
234
may be available to a county or affected local government
235
through programs such as those of the federal Office of Local
236
Defense Community Cooperation Economic Adjustment as an
237
incentive for communities to participate in a joint planning
238
process that would facilitate the compatibility and resilience
239
of community planning and the activities and mission of the
240
military installation or range.
241
(9) Any state department or local government that
242
administratively approves development projects must coordinate
243
with the state land planning agency before granting such
244
approval if the project is located in a military planning zone
245
of influence, including a military-adopted Air Installation
246
Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ), a Range Air Installation Compatible
247
Use Zone (RAICUZ), an Acoustic Buffer Zone (BZ), an Explosive
248
Safety Quantity Distance (ESQD) arc, a Military Influence
249
Overlay District (MIOD), a Military Influence Area (MIA), or a
250
Military Installation Complex Encroachment Management Action
251
Plan (ICEMAP) that provides for United States Department of
252
Defense mission assurance; protect the health, safety, and
253
welfare of the public surrounding such installations; and
254
support compatibility with operational, test, training, or other
255
national defense capabilities undertaken by the United States
256
Department of Defense within this state's terrestrial, sea
257
space, or airspace boundaries. Any development project that
258
conflicts with such protections may not be approved unless the
259
state land planning agency issues a written finding of no
260
adverse impact on the affected military installation.
261
Section 3. Part V of chapter 252, Florida Statutes,
262
consisting of ss. 252.951-252.958, is created and entitled
263
"Military Community Resiliency."
264
Section 4. Section 252.951, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
266
252.951 Legislative findings and intent.—
267
(1) The Legislature finds that:
268
(a) Florida hosts critical military installations and
269
range complexes that substantially contribute to this state's
270
economy and national defense.
271
(b) These installations depend upon community-based
272
infrastructure, utilities, transportation, housing, and services
273
located outside installation boundaries.
274
(c) When such off-installation assets are vulnerable to
275
natural hazards or other risks, mission assurance and community
276
resilience are adversely affected.
277
(d) The United States Department of Defense sponsors
278
Military Installation Readiness Reviews (MIRRs) to identify off-
279
installation vulnerabilities and to develop community projects
280
that enhance mission assurance and public resilience.
281
(e) Prioritizing MIRR-validated projects within state
282
resilience grant programs provides co-benefits to communities,
283
safeguards military operations, and supports this state's
284
economy.
285
(2) It is the intent of the Legislature to:
286
(a) Prioritize resilience projects identified and
287
validated in completed MIRRs within existing state resilience
288
grant programs.
289
(b) Protect public interests and the economic benefits
290
associated with prudent resilience investments.
291
(c) Preserve the contributions and value of military
292
installations and ranges in this state.
293
Section 5. Section 252.952, Florida Statutes, is created
294
to read:
295
252.952 Definitions.—As used in this part, the term:
296
(1) "Adverse impact" means an impact likely to impair,
297
restrict, or degrade the operation, training, research,
298
development, or testing activities of a military installation or
299
range.
300
(2) "Department" means a state department or agency that
301
administers a resilience-related grant or financial assistance
302
program.
303
(3) "Military installation" has the same meaning as in s.
304
163.3175(2).
305
(4) "Military Installation Readiness Review" or "MIRR"
306
means a study sponsored by the Department of Defense that
307
assesses community-based risks and vulnerabilities that may
308
adversely affect installation missions and identifies projects
309
to enhance resilience.
310
(5) "Resilience project" means an initiative identified
311
and validated in a MIRR report that addresses vulnerabilities in
312
physical, environmental, or operational infrastructure in the
313
surrounding community.
314
Section 6. Section 252.953, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
316
252.953 Prioritized scoring adjustment.—Subject to
317
appropriation, each department shall, within the existing
318
application scoring frameworks of its resilience-related grant
319
programs, apply a scoring adjustment that prioritizes
320
applications for resilience projects identified and validated in
321
a completed MIRR.
322
Section 7. Section 252.954, Florida Statutes, is created
323
to read:
324
252.954 Considerations.—In applying the prioritized
325
scoring adjustment, a department shall consider:
326
(1) The strategic importance of the affected installation
327
or range to this state's economy and national defense.
328
(2) The degree to which the project directly mitigates
329
vulnerabilities identified in a MIRR.
330
(3) The project's expected contribution to mission
331
assurance and operational continuity.
332
(4) Community co-benefits, including improved public
333
safety, infrastructure reliability, environmental stewardship,
334
and disaster preparedness.
335
Section 8. Section 252.955, Florida Statutes, is created
336
to read:
337
252.955 Transparency.—By October 1, 2026, each department
338
shall publish a revised prioritized scoring adjustment on its
339
website and in related program materials. Section 9. Section 252.956, Florida Statutes, is created
341
to read:
342
252.956 Oversight and reporting.—
343
(1) The Division of Emergency Management shall coordinate
344
interagency implementation of this part.
345
(2) By December 1, 2026, and annually thereafter, the
346
division shall submit a report to the Governor, the Speaker of
347
the House of Representatives, and the President of the Senate
348
that summarizes:
349
(a) Programs updated to incorporate the prioritized
350
scoring adjustment required by this part.
351
(b) Applications and awards for MIRR-validated projects.
352
(c) Observed outcomes and recommended improvements.
353
Section 10. Section 252.957, Florida Statutes, is created
354
to read:
355
252.957 Stakeholder coordination.—A department shall, as
356
appropriate, coordinate with the United States Department of
357
Defense, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, regional
358
planning councils, local governments, utilities, and private-
359
sector stakeholders to facilitate implementation of this part.
360
Section 11. Section 252.958, Florida Statutes, is created
361
to read:
362
252.958 Rulemaking.—A department may adopt rules to
363
implement this part.
364
Section 12. This act shall take effect July 1, 2026.