SESSION WATCH
Died HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. HB 1145

Electric Utility Ten-year Site Plans
Send via email
SPONSOR
Maggard
FILED BY
Randall Maggard — District 54, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
DIED IN
Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee

Filed under Local Government.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Electric Utility Ten-year Site Plans; Revises information required to be included in 10-year site plans; revises procedures for review & approval or rejection of such plans by PSC; requires electric utilities to submit revised plans to commission under certain conditions; prohibits electric utilities from filing applications for certification of certain electrical power plant sites; revises information commission is required to consider in its review of such plans; increases amount of fee commission is authorized to establish for review of such plans; revises content of rules commission is authorized to adopt for submitting, processing, & approving such plans.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Gives regulators binding power to approve or reject utility plans.

The Public Service Commission must now issue a binding final order approving, amending, or rejecting each electric utility's 10-year site plan, replacing a system where it only classified plans as 'suitable' or 'unsuitable' without binding effect.

A utility can no longer file for certification of a power plant site that isn't already in its approved 10-year plan -- it must get the site into the plan first, and any plan amendment now needs commission approval rather than just notice.

The commission must weigh four new factors when reviewing a plan: cost-effectiveness against alternatives, the benefits of in-state energy sources, regulatory and compliance costs passed to customers, and the adequacy of demand-side management.

Public hearings become mandatory for investor-owned utilities' plans, outside parties gain a broader right to be heard on other utilities' plans, and the maximum review fee rises from $1,000 to $100,000.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Turns plan review into a binding approve-or-reject order majors. 186.801

AIInstead of a non-binding 'suitable' or 'unsuitable' classification, the commission must now issue a final order approving, approving with amendments, or rejecting each 10-year site plan within 9 months of receiving it.

“shall issue a final order approving, approving with amendments, or rejecting” bill text, line 36 →
§ 2 Sets a reasonableness and customer-interest standard for approval majors. 186.801

AIThe commission must determine whether a proposed plan is reasonable and in the best interest of the utility's customers and the state before approving it, and may reject a plan that fails this section's or its own rules' requirements.

“the commission shall make a determination whether the plan is reasonable and in the best interest of the utility's customers and this state” bill text, line 42 →
§ 3 Bars certifying a power plant site left out of the approved plan majors. 186.801

AIA utility may no longer file for certification of a power plant site that is not already designated in its current, approved 10-year site plan -- closing a route that previously let an undesignated site count as an automatic plan amendment once a certification application was filed.

“An electric utility may not file an application for certification of an electrical power plant site”
§ 4 Makes public hearings mandatory for investor-owned utilities' plans majors. 186.801

AIA public hearing is now required whenever a 'public utility' as defined in section 366.02 -- one of Florida's investor-owned electric utilities -- files a 10-year site plan for commission review.

“The commission shall hold a public hearing for a 10- year site plan submitted by a public utility as defined in s. 366.02” bill text, line 51 →
§ 5 Raises the plan-review fee cap from $1,000 to $100,000 moderates. 186.801

AIThe commission's authority to charge utilities a fee for studying a 10-year site plan is renamed an administrative fee, and its ceiling rises a hundredfold, from $1,000 to $100,000 per plan studied.

“establish an administrative fee which may not exceed $100,000 for each proposed plan studied”
§ 6 Adds new factors the commission must weigh in every plan review moderates. 186.801

AIThe commission must now also consider a plan's cost-effectiveness against other options, the regulatory and compliance costs it passes to customers, the adequacy of proposed demand-side management, and the benefit of energy resources located inside Florida rather than imported.

“The benefits of energy resources sited within this state that reduce this state's reliance on energy and fuels imported from outside this state” bill text, line 82 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
1/12/2026
Now in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
1/12/2026
Referred to Commerce Committee
1/12/2026
Referred to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
1/7/2026
Filed
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 186.801
+357 / −71