SESSION WATCH
Died HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. HB 1157

Litigation Financing
Send via email
SPONSOR
Basabe
FILED BY
Fabián Basabe — District 106, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
DIED IN
Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee

Filed under Legal.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Litigation Financing; Requires courts to consider potential conflicts of interest that may arise from existence of litigation financing agreement in specified circumstances; prohibits specified acts by litigation financiers; requires certain parties that enter into specified litigation financing agreements to serve specified notice; provides requirements for such notices; provides that certain information is not required to be included in such notices; authorizes courts to take specified actions relating to such notices; prohibits foreign funders from taking specified actions; provides construction; provides that litigation financing agreement is void & unenforceable in specified circumstances; provides for enforcement of specified violations under Florida Deceptive & Unfair Trade Practices Act; authorizes court, agency, or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to impose fines or other sanctions for certain violations.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Bars litigation funders from controlling lawsuits or taking outsized cuts.

A new law regulates third-party litigation funding statewide. Financiers who front money to a plaintiff or law firm for a cut of the outcome cannot direct case strategy, take more than plaintiffs collectively keep, or pay referral kickbacks.

When a foreign person, government, or sovereign wealth fund supplies 5% or more of a funding deal, that relationship must be disclosed to the court, all parties, and two state agencies within days of signing or filing.

Dollar amounts and trade secrets in the funding deal stay out of the public notice. Foreign funders also cannot route money through shell entities to dodge the disclosure duty.

Breaking the conduct rules is an unfair trade practice; breaking the disclosure rule draws court sanctions. An agreement that violates the new part is void outright.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Financiers barred from directing litigation or settlement decisions majors. 69.105

AIA litigation financier cannot make or influence decisions about how a case proceeds, including choice of counsel, expert witnesses, strategy, or whether and how to settle. Those decisions stay solely with the party and their attorney of record.

“Direct, or make any decisions with respect to, the course of any civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or other legal proceeding” bill text, line 165 →
§ 2 Financier's payout capped below what plaintiffs collectively keep majors. 69.105

AIA financier cannot contract for or receive a bigger share of a case's proceeds than the share the plaintiffs themselves collectively recover after attorney fees and costs are paid, so the financier can never out-earn the people it financed.

“than the share of the proceeds collectively recovered by the plaintiffs to any such action, claim, or proceeding after the payment of any attorney fees” bill text, line 180 →
§ 3 Foreign litigation funding must be disclosed within days majors. 69.107

AIWhen a foreign person, government, or sovereign wealth fund provides financing, the party or their counsel must file and serve notice within 14 days of signing the funding deal or 7 days of filing the case, whichever comes first.

“shall, within 14 days after execution of the agreement or within 7 days after filing such action, whichever occurs first, file and serve a notice” bill text, line 204 →
§ 4 Foreign funders barred from using shell entities to dodge disclosure majors. 69.107

AIA foreign funder or anyone acting for it cannot route money through a domestic entity or affiliate to conceal or evade the disclosure requirement, and cannot share proprietary, privileged, or national-security information from the case with outside foreign parties.

“Use a domestic entity or affiliate to conceal or evade the disclosure requirements of this section” bill text, line 232 →
§ 5 Rule-breaking voids the agreement and triggers penalties majors. 69.111

AIAn agreement that violates the new part is void and unenforceable outright. Violating the conduct rules is a deceptive and unfair trade practice under Florida's consumer protection law, and courts, agencies, or tribunals can fine violators of the disclosure rule.

“A litigation financing agreement executed in violation of this part is void and unenforceable.” bill text, line 253 →
§ 6 Notice must name major owners of the funder, not dollar figures moderates. 69.107

AIThe disclosure must identify anyone who owns or controls 3% or more of the litigation financier, but the dollar amounts, financing terms, and other proprietary details of the deal are not required to be included and can be filed under seal.

“owns or controls 3 percent or more of the capital, equity, or other beneficial ownership interests in the litigation financier” bill text, line 213 →
§ 7 Referral kickbacks to attorneys and health providers barred moderates. 69.105

AIA financier cannot pay a commission, referral fee, or other consideration to any person, explicitly including an attorney, a law firm, or a health care practitioner, for steering a client to the financier.

“commission, referral fee, or other consideration to any person, including an attorney, a law firm, or a health care practitioner” bill text, line 185 →
§ 8 Courts may weigh funding deals in class-action adequacy rulings moderates. 69.103

AIA court deciding whether a class representative, class counsel, or lead counsel in a consolidated case can fairly represent everyone's interests may take the existence of a litigation financing agreement into account.

“A court may take the existence of a litigation financing agreement into account” bill text, line 150 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
1/15/2026
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
1/15/2026
Referred to Judiciary Committee
1/15/2026
Referred to Justice Budget Subcommittee
1/15/2026
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
1/7/2026
Filed
1 EARLIER →
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 69.101
+0 / −0
s. 69.103
+0 / −0
s. 69.105
+0 / −0
s. 69.107
+0 / −0
s. 69.111
+0 / −0
s. 69.101
+896 / −0