SESSION WATCH
Died HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. HB 119

Shari'a and Other Foreign Law
Send via email
SPONSOR
Cassel
FILED BY
Hillary Cassel — District 101, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026

Filed under Legal.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Shari'a and Other Foreign Law; Defines "foreign law, legal code, or system"; provides that certain rulings, decisions, or contractual provisions are void & unenforceable if such rulings, decisions, or contractual provisions allow application of Shari'a or certain foreign laws, legal codes, or systems; prohibits transfer of certain civil actions to another court.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Voids rulings and contracts that let foreign law deny constitutional rights.

A state court ruling, arbitration decision, or contract clause that lets Shari'a or any other foreign legal system operate becomes void and unenforceable, but only when that foreign law would deny rights the U.S. or Florida Constitution guarantees.

The definition covers the law of any country or international body outside the United States, so despite the bill's short title, the rule is not limited to Shari'a; it can reach any nation's legal system.

The law does not reach corporations, partnerships, or associations that voluntarily choose foreign law or a foreign court in their own contracts, and it does not touch how a religious organization governs its own clergy or doctrine.

Courts, arbitration panels, and administrative agencies can no longer transfer a case to another venue if doing so would likely let a foreign legal system override those same constitutional protections.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Rulings and contracts applying rights-denying foreign law are void majors. 45.085(4)

AIA court ruling, arbitration decision, or contract clause that applies Shari'a or any other foreign legal system is void and unenforceable if that application would deny a party rights guaranteed by the U.S. or Florida Constitution, such as due process or equal protection.

“is void and unenforceable if such ruling, decision, or provision allows the application of Shari'a or any foreign law” bill text, line 43 →
§ 2 "Foreign law" is defined broadly, not limited to Shari'a majors. 45.085(3)

AIThe term foreign law, legal code, or system is defined to mean the law of any jurisdiction outside every U.S. state and territory, including international organizations and tribunals, so the operative rule can reach any nation's legal system, not only Shari'a.

“means any law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States” bill text, line 30 →
§ 3 Act does not limit a religious organization's control over clergy or doctrine majors. 45.085(5)(b)

AIThe act explicitly does not limit how a religious organization selects, disciplines, or removes its clergy, or how it interprets its own doctrine, keeping those internal, ecclesiastical decisions outside the reach of this new rule.

“Limit adjudication of ecclesiastical matters of a religious organization, including the selection, appointment, discipline, or removal of clergy” bill text, line 51 →
§ 4 Act does not apply to businesses that voluntarily choose foreign law majors. 45.085(5)(c)

AIA corporation, partnership, or association that voluntarily agrees to foreign law or a foreign court in its own contract is not covered by this act, so those commercial choice-of-law and forum-selection clauses remain enforceable.

“Apply to corporations, partnerships, or associations that voluntarily subject themselves to foreign law or courts” bill text, line 54 →
§ 5 Courts barred from transferring cases to enable rights-denying foreign law majors. 47.122(2)

AIA court, arbitration panel, tribunal, or administrative agency may not transfer a civil action to another venue if the transfer would result in applying Shari'a or any foreign law that would violate or likely violate a party's fundamental constitutional rights.

“may not transfer any civil action under this section if such transfer would result in the application of Shari'a or any foreign law” bill text, line 67 →
§ 6 Act does not disturb existing Florida Supreme Court precedent moderates. 45.085(5)(a)

AIThe act states it does not disapprove or abrogate any existing ruling of the Florida Supreme Court, so past decisions remain intact even where they touch on foreign or religious law.

“Disapprove or abrogate existing precedent of the Florida Supreme Court” bill text, line 49 →
§ 7 Federal preemption, including treaties, overrides the act moderates. 45.085(5)(d)

AIWhere federal law, including obligations under a treaty or international agreement, preempts state law, this act does not apply, so a conflicting federal rule controls instead.

“Apply where federal law preempts state law, including obligations under treaties or international agreements” bill text, line 56 →
TIMELINE
1/9/2026
Withdrawn prior to introduction
10/14/2025
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
10/14/2025
Referred to Judiciary Committee
10/14/2025
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
10/8/2025
Filed
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 45.085
+318 / −0
s. 47.122
+70 / −0