SESSION WATCH
Died HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. CS/HB 1297

Beach Management
Send via email
SPONSOR
Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee; Greco
FILED BY
Sam Greco — District 19, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
DIED IN
State Affairs Committee

Filed under Environment & Water.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Beach Management; Requires DEP to review certain data when designating certain beaches as critically eroded & in need of restoration & nourishment; requires that certain beaches be designated as critically eroded; authorizes Secretary of Environmental Protection to require coastal local governments to develop specified plans.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Requires DEP to designate certain qualifying beaches as critically eroded.

A beach must be designated 'critically eroded' -- qualifying it for state restoration funding -- if its local government has a funding plan, holds a perpetual easement requiring shoreline maintenance and retreat management, and the beach has geology causing repeated inland flooding or structural damage.

Before designating any beach as critically eroded, DEP must now review data on beaches that have been repeatedly, preemptively repaired using private, local, state, and federal funds to stop or slow erosion.

The DEP secretary may require coastal local governments to write local strategic beach management plans covering flooding, property values, sensitive lands, and recommendations from coastal engineers and the Army Corps of Engineers.

Low-lying land just inland of a dune or beach that has repeatedly flooded from a connected stormwater system, or spent long stretches under a local emergency declaration, now counts toward designating an area of critical state concern.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Mandatory 'critically eroded' designation for qualifying beaches majors. 161.101(1)(c)

AIIf a local government has a funding plan for the state's beach management plan, holds a perpetual easement requiring it to maintain shoreline parcels and manage shoreline retreat, and the beach's geology causes repeated inland flooding or structural damage, DEP must designate that beach as critically eroded rather than deciding case by case.

“such beach must be designated as critically eroded” bill text, line 56 →
§ 2 DEP must review repair-funding history before designating majors. 161.101(1)(b)

AIBefore designating any beach as critically eroded, DEP must review data on beaches that have been preemptively and repeatedly repaired using private funding, local government funding, and state and federal grants to stop or mitigate erosion.

“the department shall review data related to beaches that have been preemptively and repeatedly repaired to avoid complete erosion” bill text, line 48 →
§ 3 Secretary may require local strategic beach management plans majors. 161.101(2)(b)

AIThe DEP secretary may require coastal local governments to develop local strategic beach management plans covering shoreline recreational facilities, research centers, flooding, property values, sensitive lands, and recommendations from coastal engineers and the Army Corps of Engineers.

“The secretary of the department may, as he or she deems necessary, require coastal local governments to develop local strategic beach management plans.” bill text, line 74 →
§ 4 Flood-prone land behind beaches added to critical-concern criteria majors. 380.05(2)(a)

AILow-elevation land just inland of a dune or beach that has been repeatedly breached or overtopped through a connected stormwater system is added to the resources considered when designating an area of critical state concern, a status carrying strong state land-use oversight.

“low elevation sections immediately inland of the dune and beach which have been repeatedly breached or overtopped by seawater flowing into an interconnected stormwater system” bill text, line 122 →
§ 5 Local beach plans feed into the statewide strategic plan moderates. 161.161(2)(a)

AIThe state's comprehensive strategic beach management plan may now incorporate these new local strategic beach management plans alongside regional plans when recommending which critically eroded beaches most need funding.

“including plans developed pursuant to s. 161.101(2)(b),” bill text, line 102 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in State Affairs Committee
2/12/2026
Now in State Affairs Committee
2/12/2026
Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
2/12/2026
Favorable by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
2/10/2026
Added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda
2/6/2026
Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
2/6/2026
Referred to State Affairs Committee
2/6/2026
Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
2/4/2026
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
2/4/2026
CS Filed
2/4/2026
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
2/4/2026
Reported out of Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
2/4/2026
Favorable with CS by Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
2/2/2026
Added to Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee agenda
1/15/2026
Now in Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
1/15/2026
Referred to State Affairs Committee
1/15/2026
Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
1/15/2026
Referred to Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
1/8/2026
Filed
14 EARLIER →
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 161.101
+286 / −18
s. 161.161
+7 / −1
s. 380.05
+40 / −3
s. 380.05
+0 / −0
s. 380.045
+0 / −0
STAFF ANALYSES