SESSION WATCH
Superseded — its companion passed HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. CS/CS/HB 1457

Stormwater Treatment
Send via email
SPONSOR
State Affairs Committee; Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee; Gonzalez Pittman; Overdorf
FILED BY
Karen Gonzalez Pittman — District 65, Republican [search donations]
Tobin Overdorf — District 85, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
COMPANION
CS/CS/SB 848 — CS/CS/HB 1457 was set aside and its companion carried the policy

Filed under Environment & Water.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Stormwater Treatment ; Prohibits certain stormwater treatment & net improvement activities; requires DEP to require specified documentation for issuance of environmental resource permit for regional stormwater management systems; provides requirements for environmental resource permits authorizing such systems; authorizes certain permit applicants to purchase & use certain pollution reduction allocations & water quality enhancement credits; requires DEP & water management districts to use specified information to establish drainage areas; provides that certain use of enhancement credits constitutes stormwater treatment; provides that certain pollutant load reductions may not be referred to as enhancement credits; requires DEP to file specified rules for adoption by specified date; provides for water quality enhancement provisional permits; provides for modification of such permits under certain conditions; requires DEP & water management districts to recognize enhancement credits established in provisional permits; clarifies types of mitigation measures for compensating stormwater treatment which DEP or water management district governing boards must consider.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Shifts water-quality compliance liability from credit buyers to credit sellers.

Companies that need a Florida stormwater or wetland permit can satisfy it by buying credits from a separate stormwater system or water-quality enhancement area, instead of building their own full treatment on-site.

Using a purchased enhancement credit now shifts legal responsibility for meeting water-quality rules onto the seller. It also drops the old requirement to first show onsite stormwater work is properly designed.

Anyone building one of these shared regional systems must post a bond and a long-term endowment to guarantee upkeep. Which properties can buy its credits depends on a federal watershed boundary, by default.

The state must start issuing these enhancement-area credits under provisional permits even before it finishes writing the rules, and those credits stay valid later. Certain smaller ports also lose access to outside credit sellers.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Bars outside operators from crediting stormwater work at smaller ports majors. 311.106

AIFor a seaport not named in s. 403.021(9)(b) and not in Citrus or Putnam County, a regional stormwater system or water quality enhancement area run by a non-local governmental entity can no longer supply the treatment or net-improvement credit that port activity's permit requires.

“operated by a non-local governmental entity independently or under contract with a seaport or local government, may not provide stormwater treatment” bill text, line 85 →
§ 2 Requires long-term financial assurance for regional stormwater systems majors. 373.413

AIAn applicant for a regional stormwater management system permit must post financial assurance, including bonds or insurance sized to construction costs, plus a separate endowment or similar mechanism sized to cover operation and maintenance for as long as the system is relied on.

“an endowment or other long-term financial assurance mechanism sufficient to ensure operation and maintenance for the entire period” bill text, line 138 →
§ 3 Sets the default watershed boundary for who can buy a system's credits majors. 373.413

AIA permit for a regional stormwater system must map the drainage area it serves, and only projects within that area may buy its pollution reduction allocations. The area defaults to a federal HUC 12 sub-basin unless the applicant justifies a different boundary.

“shall use Hydrologic Unit Code 12 (HUC 12) sub-basin as set forth by the United States Geological Survey to establish the drainage area” bill text, line 157 →
§ 4 Moves water-quality compliance liability from buyer to credit seller majors. 373.4134

AIWhen a permit holder uses a water quality enhancement credit to meet a treatment requirement, legal responsibility for actually meeting that requirement moves from the permit holder who bought the credit to the enhancement area that generated it.

“transfers the legal responsibility for complying with the applicable regulatory water quality treatment requirement from the purchaser and user” bill text, line 183 →
§ 5 Drops the design-assurance precondition for using enhancement credits majors. 373.4134

AICurrent law lets enhancement credits satisfy a permit only after the buyer has already given reasonable assurance that all onsite stormwater management is properly designed and built; the bill deletes that precondition entirely.

“after reasonable assurances have been provided for the design and construction of all onsite stormwater management, as required by law.” bill text, line 198 →
§ 6 Lets the state issue credits under provisional permits before rules exist majors. 373.4134

AIInstead of waiting on the rules the act still requires by October 2026, the department must review and act on water quality enhancement provisional permits now, and credits issued under one keep counting even after final rules are adopted.

“This section may not be implemented until the department adopts such rules.” bill text, line 229 →
§ 7 Reserves the word "credit" for enhancement-area credits only moderates. 373.4134

AIPollutant reductions achieved through a regional stormwater system cannot be labeled or marketed as a credit; only reductions generated by a water quality enhancement area may use that term.

“the term "credit" shall not be used to refer to pollutant reduction achieved through compensating stormwater treatment” bill text, line 220 →
§ 8 Sets a minimum size for enhancement service area boundaries moderates. 373.4134

AIThe area within which a water quality enhancement area's credits may be used to offset impacts must now cover at least a full federal HUC 8 sub-basin, rather than whatever smaller area the department previously judged sufficient.

“must, at a minimum, consist of a Hydrologic Unit Code 8 (HUC 8) sub-basin as set forth by the United States Geological Survey” bill text, line 211 →
TIMELINE
3/11/2026
Laid on Table; Companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/SB 848 (Ch. 2026-60 )
3/2/2026
Added to Second Reading Calendar
3/2/2026
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
3/2/2026
Bill referred to House Calendar
2/27/2026
CS Filed
2/27/2026
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
2/27/2026
Reported out of State Affairs Committee
2/26/2026
Favorable with CS by State Affairs Committee
2/24/2026
Added to State Affairs Committee agenda
2/17/2026
Now in State Affairs Committee
2/17/2026
Referred to State Affairs Committee
2/16/2026
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
2/16/2026
CS Filed
2/16/2026
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
2/16/2026
Reported out of Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
2/12/2026
Favorable with CS by Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
2/10/2026
Added to Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee agenda
1/15/2026
Now in Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
1/15/2026
Referred to State Affairs Committee
1/15/2026
Referred to Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
1/9/2026
Filed
16 EARLIER →
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 311.106
+153 / −0
s. 373.403
+73 / −0
s. 373.413
+425 / −0
s. 373.4134
+387 / −61
s. 373.414
+14 / −7
s. 373.414
+0 / −0
STAFF ANALYSES