SESSION WATCH
Died HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. CS/HB 1551

Products Liability for Firearms
Send via email
SPONSOR
Judiciary Committee; Duggan
FILED BY
Wyman Duggan — District 12, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
upon becoming a law
DIED IN
Rules

Filed under Legal.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Products Liability for Firearms; Provides that firearm manufacturer is not liable for certain torts based on absence or presence of certain features, mechanisms, or standards not required under federal law.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Bars lawsuits against gunmakers over safety features federal law doesn't require.

Florida law will bar a lawsuit against a firearm manufacturer over a design feature, safety mechanism, or performance standard the gun lacks or includes, as long as federal law does not require it either way.

Four features are named as examples: a magazine disconnect mechanism, a loaded chamber indicator, authorized-user recognition technology, and an external manual safety such as a trigger safety.

The immunity does not cover an actual manufacturing or design defect, or a failure to live up to the manufacturer's own express warranties, so ordinary defect and warranty claims still go forward.

The new protection only reaches cases filed after this act takes effect, so it does not apply to a lawsuit that was already pending or filed beforehand.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Manufacturers shielded from suits over optional safety features majors. 768.1258(2)

AIA firearm manufacturer cannot be held liable, under any products-liability theory, for a design feature, mechanism, or performance standard a gun has or lacks, as long as federal law does not require that feature either way.

“a firearm manufacturer is not liable under a theory of defective product design, failure to warn, negligence, strict liability” bill text, line 32 →
§ 2 Immunity covers both missing and included features majors. 768.1258(2)

AIThe shield applies whether the claim is based on the absence of a feature, since the gun lacks it, or its presence, since the gun has it, as long as federal law doesn't mandate one way or the other.

“based on the absence or presence of any design feature, functionality, safety mechanism, or performance standard that is not required by federal law” bill text, line 35 →
§ 3 Actual defects and broken warranties remain actionable majors. 768.1258(3)

AIThe immunity does not apply where the claimant proves the firearm had an actual manufacturing or design defect, or that it failed to perform consistent with the manufacturer's own express warranties or representations.

“the firearm contained an actual manufacturing or design defect or failed to operate in a manner consistent with the manufacturer's express warranties” bill text, line 46 →
§ 4 Four named features: safeties, indicators, and smart-gun tech moderates. 768.1258(2)(a)

AIThe immunity explicitly names four kinds of optional safety technology as covered examples: a magazine disconnect mechanism, a loaded chamber indicator, authorized user recognition technology, and an external manual safety.

“A magazine disconnect mechanism; (b) A loaded chamber indicator; (c) Authorized user recognition technology; or (d) An external manual safety” bill text, line 40 →
§ 5 Shield applies only to lawsuits filed after the act takes effect moderates. 768.1258(4)

AIThe new immunity does not reach back to cover a lawsuit already filed before this act's effective date; it applies only to a case filed afterward.

“This section shall apply to causes of action filed after the effective date of this act” bill text, line 50 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in Rules
3/5/2026
Received
3/5/2026
Referred to Rules
3/5/2026
In Messages
3/5/2026
CS passed; YEAS 75, NAYS 29
3/5/2026
Read 3rd time
3/5/2026
Added to Third Reading Calendar
3/5/2026
Amendment 787357 Failed
3/5/2026
Amendment 596601 Failed
3/5/2026
Amendment 043387 Failed
3/5/2026
Read 2nd time
3/2/2026
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (3/5/2026)
2/18/2026
Added to Second Reading Calendar
2/18/2026
Bill referred to House Calendar
2/17/2026
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
2/17/2026
CS Filed
2/17/2026
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
2/17/2026
Reported out of Judiciary Committee
2/17/2026
Favorable with CS by Judiciary Committee
2/13/2026
Added to Judiciary Committee agenda
2/3/2026
Now in Judiciary Committee
2/3/2026
Reported out of Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
2/3/2026
Favorable by Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
1/30/2026
Added to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee agenda
1/15/2026
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
1/15/2026
Referred to Judiciary Committee
1/15/2026
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
1/9/2026
Filed
23 EARLIER →
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 768.1258
+289 / −0
STAFF ANALYSES