SESSION WATCH
Superseded — its companion passed SENATE · SESSION 2026

No. SB 1644

Interpersonal Violence Injunctions
Send via email
SPONSOR
McClain
FILED BY
Stan McClain — District 9, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
COMPANION
CS/CS/HB 277 — SB 1644 was set aside and its companion carried the policy

Filed under Criminal Justice.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Interpersonal Violence Injunctions; Revising the required forms, motions, and information all clerk of the court offices must provide to assist petitioners; revising the factors the court is required to consider and evaluate in determining whether a petitioner has reasonable cause to believe that he or she is in imminent danger of becoming a victim of domestic violence; prohibiting a court from issuing mutual orders of protection; requiring the court, upon the filing of a petition for an injunction for protection against stalking, to review the petition ex parte and set a final hearing at the earliest possible time under certain circumstances, etc.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Courts must issue immediate protection and ban mutual orders.

Courts are prohibited from issuing mutual orders of protection in domestic violence cases. This ensures the victim receives exclusive protection without the abuser gaining reciprocal rights.

Judges must immediately review petitions and set final hearings at the earliest possible time if imminent danger appears. This accelerates legal protection for victims facing urgent threats.

Respondents must be personally served by a law enforcement officer before final hearings. This removes alternative service methods and ensures direct, official notification to the accused party.

Courts must provide written legal grounds when denying temporary injunctions. This creates a formal record explaining why immediate protection was refused to the petitioner.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Prohibition on Mutual Orders of Protection majors. 741.30(2)(f)

AICourts are barred from issuing a single order that protects both parties in a domestic violence case.

“A court may not issue mutual orders of protection” bill text, line 789 →
§ 2 Mandatory Ex Parte Review and Final Hearing majors. 741.30(4)

AICourts must immediately review petitions and set a final hearing if the petitioner appears to be in imminent danger.

“the court shall review the petition ex parte and must set a final hearing to be held at the earliest possible time” bill text, line 366 →
§ 3 Mandatory Law Enforcement Service majors. 741.30(4)

AIRespondents must be personally served by a law enforcement officer before the final hearing.

“the respondent must be personally served by a law enforcement officer”
§ 4 Mandatory Ex Parte Review and Final Hearing for Stalking Petitions majors. 784.0485(4)

AICourts must immediately review stalking petitions and set a final hearing if stalking appears to exist, rather than waiting for a full hearing.

“the court shall review the petition ex parte and must set a final hearing to be held at the earliest possible time if it appears that the petitioner is a victim of stalking” bill text, line 366 →
§ 5 Mandatory Law Enforcement Service of Stalking Injunctions majors. 784.0485(4)

AIRespondents in stalking cases must be personally served by a law enforcement officer, removing the option for service by other means.

“the respondent must be personally served by a law enforcement officer with a copy of the petition, notice of hearing, and temporary injunction”
§ 6 Expanded Statewide Verification System moderates. 741.30(8)(b)

AIThe statewide database now includes dating, sexual, and stalking violence injunctions in addition to domestic and repeat violence.

“domestic violence injunctions, dating violence injunctions, sexual violence injunctions, and repeat violence injunctions, and stalking injunctions” bill text, line 1016 →
§ 7 Mandatory Written Denial Orders moderates. 741.30(5)(b)

AICourts must provide written legal grounds when denying a request for an ex parte temporary injunction.

“A denial of a petition for an ex parte temporary injunction shall be by written order noting the legal grounds for denial” bill text, line 427 →
§ 8 Expanded Factors for Final Injunctions moderates. 741.30(6)(a)

AICourts must now consider strangulation and other forms of abuse when evaluating a petitioner's claim of imminent danger.

“including threats, harassment, stalking, strangulation, or other physical abuse” bill text, line 511 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in Criminal Justice, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB...
1/22/2026
Introduced
1/16/2026
Referred to Criminal Justice; Appropriations Committee on Criminal...
1/9/2026
Filed
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 741.30
+417 / −71
s. 784.046
+817 / −74
s. 784.0485
+525 / −114
s. 61.1825
+1 / −7
s. 943.05
+1 / −5
s. 741.30
+0 / −0