THE BILL ITSELF
CS/SB 18
Relief of the Estate of M.N. by the Broward County Sheriff’s Office
Florida Senate - 2026 (NP) CS for SB 18 By the Committee on Judiciary; and Senator Martin 590-02449-26 202618c1
1
A bill to be entitled
2
An act for the relief of the Estate of M.N. by the
3
Broward County Sheriff’s Office; providing an
4
appropriation to compensate the estate for injuries
5
sustained by M.N. and her subsequent death as a result
6
of the negligence of the Broward County Sheriff’s
7
Office; providing a limitation on compensation and the
8
payment of attorney fees; providing an effective date.
10
WHEREAS, Keshia Walsh and Christopher Nevarez were parents
11
to M.N., born on April 20, 2016, and to D.N., born on February
12
2, 2012, and
13
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2016, Ms. Walsh brought M.N., then 3
14
months old, to Broward Health Medical Center reporting that M.N.
15
had fallen from a couch and sustained a black eye while they
16
were at the home of Juan Santos, where Ms. Walsh and M.N. were
17
living at the time, and
18
WHEREAS, Mr. Nevarez and Ms. Walsh brought M.N. to a
19
follow-up pediatrician appointment pursuant to follow-up care
20
instructions from Broward Health Medical Center, and
21
WHEREAS, at the follow-up visit, Mr. Nevarez questioned the
22
doctor as to whether M.N. could have sustained her injuries as
23
the result of a fall, and the doctor responded that it was
24
possible, and
25
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, Ms. Walsh brought 5-month-old
26
M.N. to Northwest Medical Center, in Broward County, with a
27
fever and intermittent leg pain, and
28
WHEREAS, diagnostic imaging revealed that M.N. had multiple
29
fractures in her upper and lower extremities which were in
30
different stages of healing, including fractures to her left
31
tibia, left fibula, and left radius, which Ms. Walsh had no
32
explanation for, and
33
WHEREAS, the treating physician consulted with a pediatric
34
orthopedic specialist who, upon reviewing M.N.’s diagnostic
35
imaging, advised that the fractures appeared to be non
36
accidental and recommended that her injuries be reported to the
37
Florida Abuse Hotline overseen by the Department of Children and
38
Families, and
39
WHEREAS, a report was made to the Florida Abuse Hotline and
40
was assigned to the Broward County Sheriff’s Office (BSO), the
41
agency responsible for child protective investigations in
42
Broward County, and
43
WHEREAS, a BSO child protective investigator (CPI)
44
responded to the hospital, observed the injuries, learned that
45
they were unexplained and occurred under the care of Ms. Walsh
46
while living with Mr. Santos, and noted that Ms. Walsh had
47
previously taken M.N. to multiple facilities for treatment for
48
various injuries, including the prior black eye, and
49
WHEREAS, Mr. Nevarez had been an active parent in M.N.’s
50
life; however, Ms. Walsh cut off contact with Mr. Nevarez in
51
mid-September 2016, and refused to tell him where she and M.N.
52
were living, and
53
WHEREAS, Mr. Nevarez was the non-offending parent, meaning
54
he had no role in causing or failing to prevent M.N.’s injuries,
55
Mr. Nevarez was required to be the first person contacted by the
56
BSO during the investigation, and, if contact was initially
57
unsuccessful, the BSO was required to make daily attempts to
58
contact Mr. Nevarez, and
59
WHEREAS, the BSO failed to contact Mr. Navarez immediately,
60
failed to notify him that M.N. had multiple unexplained
61
fractures in different stages of healing, failed to immediately
62
place M.N. with Mr. Nevarez for her protection, and failed to
63
make daily attempts to contact Mr. Nevarez, and
64
WHEREAS, when an abuse investigation is initiated at a
65
hospital emergency room, the CPI is required to consult with the
66
attending physician to determine whether the injury is the
67
result of maltreatment and immediately contact the Child
68
Protective Team (CPT) in person or by phone to discuss all
69
reports of fractures in a child of any age; however, the BSO
70
failed to consult with the attending physician and failed to
71
contact the CPT from the hospital, and
72
WHEREAS, during an abuse investigation, the BSO’s
73
assessment of the safety and perceived needs of the child and
74
family must include a face-to-face interview with the child,
75
other siblings, parents, and other adults in the household;
76
however, the BSO failed to interview Mr. Santos, and
77
WHEREAS, the BSO is required to review the prior criminal
78
history of parents and caregivers and complete a criminal
79
history check within 24 hours of an individual’s identity and
80
presence in the home becoming known to the investigator;
81
however, the BSO failed to complete a background check on Mr.
82
Santos, and
83
WHEREAS, despite the BSO’s actual knowledge of a pattern of
84
unexplained injuries to M.N., M.N.’s three unexplained diagnosed
85
fractures, and the CPI’s personal observations of bruising
86
around M.N.’s eye and discoloration on M.N.’s left wrist, the
87
CPI did not suspect abuse, found that there was no present
88
danger or threat to M.N., allowed M.N. to be discharged from the
89
hospital into Ms. Walsh’s custody, and implemented a Safety Plan
90
for M.N. to remain in Ms. Walsh’s care with no further
91
investigation into how M.N. sustained her injuries, and
92
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2016, the BSO supervisor instructed
93
the CPI to obtain the medical file from M.N.’s August hospital
94
visit, obtain collateral information from neighbors, and refer
95
daycare services to Ms. Walsh, and
96
WHEREAS, the CPI’s chronological case notes do not reflect
97
any activity on the investigation into M.N.’s injuries after
98
these directives, and
99
WHEREAS, the BSO also failed to review M.N.’s medical file,
100
have M.N. seen by CPT, interview any third-parties, including
101
family, friends, and neighbors, and ensure M.N. was enrolled in
102
daycare, and
103
WHEREAS, Ann McClain, M.N.’s paternal grandmother, with
104
whom M.N. and Ms. Walsh previously resided until Ms. Walsh
105
abruptly left the home in mid-September 2016 with M.N.,
106
maintained some contact via text messages with Ms. Walsh, but
107
could not discover where Ms. Walsh and M.N. were living, and
108
WHEREAS, Mr. Nevarez repeatedly tried to see M.N. and find
109
out where she was living by texting Ms. Walsh, going to Ms.
110
Walsh’s place of employment, contacting Ms. Walsh’s relatives
111
and friends, and going to D.N.’s daycare, but Ms. Walsh ignored
112
his repeated requests to see M.N., and
113
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2016, while the BSO’s child
114
protective investigation was still open, M.N. sustained life
115
threatening injuries including a parietal skull fracture, brain
116
and spinal cord trauma, retinal hemorrhages, and two femur
117
fractures due to abuse while in the care of Ms. Walsh and Mr.
118
Santos, and
119
WHEREAS, M.N. was transported to the hospital and declared
120
brain dead that same day, placed on life support, and died on
121
October 28, 2016, and
122
WHEREAS, the BSO closed its investigation into M.N.’s abuse
123
on July 17, 2017, with verified findings of bone fractures,
124
internal injuries, threatened harm, and death, and
125
WHEREAS, the BSO placed D.N. in Mr. Nevarez’s care,
126
implemented a safety plan preventing Ms. Walsh from having
127
contact with D.N., and Ms. Walsh’s parental rights to D.N. were
128
terminated on June 20, 2018, at the BSO’s request, and
129
WHEREAS, but for the BSO’s negligence in failing to
130
reasonably investigate allegations of abuse of M.N., and failing
131
to remove M.N. from Ms. Walsh and Mr. Santos’ care, the injuries
132
sustained during the BSO’s investigation and M.N.’s death would
133
not have occurred, and
134
WHEREAS, in August 2023, the case was tried in the 17th
135
Judicial Circuit Court of Broward County, and
136
WHEREAS, the BSO admitted negligence at trial, and the jury
137
found that M.N.’s death and Mr. Nevarez’s loss were due to BSO’s
138
failure to conduct a thorough child protective investigation and
139
ensure M.N.’s safety, and
140
WHEREAS, the court awarded $4.5 million to Mr. Nevarez,
141
M.N.’s non-offending father, for his pain and suffering, of
142
which $2.61 million, or 58 percent of the fault, was attributed
143
to BSO, and
144
WHEREAS, the BSO has paid $110,000 and Broward County has
145
paid $90,000 for claims against the County related to CPT, which
146
has exhausted the sovereign immunity limits set forth in s.
147
768.28, Florida Statutes, and
148
WHEREAS, the court entered a cost judgment awarding taxable
149
costs in the amount of $88,258.50 to the Estate of M.N., to be
150
paid by the BSO, and
151
WHEREAS, the Estate of M.N. is responsible for payment of
152
attorney fees and all remaining costs and expenses relating to
153
this claim, subject to the limitations set forth in this act,
154
and
155
WHEREAS, the sum of $2,588,258.50, representing the
156
judgment from the verdict against the BSO in the amount of $2.61
157
million plus the cost judgment entered against the BSO in the
158
amount of $88,258.50, less BSO’s payment of $110,000 in
159
satisfaction of its portion of the sovereign immunity limits,
160
remains unpaid by the BSO, NOW, THEREFORE,
162
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
164
Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act are
165
found and declared to be true.
166
Section 2. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office is
167
authorized and directed to appropriate from funds not otherwise
168
encumbered and to draw a warrant in the sum of $2,588,258.50
169
payable to the Estate of M.N. as compensation for injuries and
170
damages sustained.
171
Section 3. The amount paid by the Broward County Sheriff’s
172
Office pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the amount
173
awarded under this act are intended to provide the sole
174
compensation for all present and future claims arising out of
175
the factual situation described in this act which resulted in
176
injuries and damages to the Estate of M.N. The total amount paid
177
for attorney fees relating to this claim may not exceed 25
178
percent of the total amount awarded under this act.
179
Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.