SESSION WATCH
Superseded — its companion passed SENATE · SESSION 2026

No. CS/CS/SB 332

Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights
Send via email
SPONSOR
Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Judiciary; Bradley
FILED BY
Jennifer Bradley — District 6, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
COMPANION
CS/CS/HB 655 — CS/CS/SB 332 was set aside and its companion carried the policy

Filed under Local Government.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights; Providing an exemption from public meetings requirements for meetings or portions of meetings between agencies and their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights; requiring that such meetings be transcribed; providing that such transcripts become public records at specified times; providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemptions; providing a statement of public necessity, etc.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Allows closed-door agency-attorney meetings on Bert Harris property claims.

Government agencies may now meet privately with their attorney to strategize about a Bert Harris Act property-rights claim, closed to the public despite Florida's open-meetings law.

The closed session is only allowed during the 90-day notice period before a lawsuit can be filed, must stick to settlement talks or strategy, and requires a certified court reporter to record every word.

The public must be told in advance when the session will happen and who is attending, and the meeting must open and close in public even though the substantive discussion itself is closed.

The transcript becomes public once the claim settles, or once the deadline to sue passes without a lawsuit or settlement; the text does not say what happens if a lawsuit is filed and never settles.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Allows closed attorney-client meetings on Bert Harris claims majors. 70.90

AIDuring the 90-day pre-suit notice period for a Bert Harris Act property-rights claim, an agency and its attorney may meet privately to discuss settlement or strategy, closed to the public despite the Sunshine Law's normal open-meetings requirement.

“to discuss claims submitted in accordance with that subsection is exempt from s. 286.011 and s. 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution” bill text, line 28 →
§ 2 Requires full, gap-free transcription of the closed session majors. 70.90

AIA certified court reporter must record the entire session, including who was present and who spoke, with no portion left off the record, and file a full transcript with the agency's clerk.

“No portion of the session may be off the record.” bill text, line 42 →
§ 3 Opens the transcript once the claim settles or lapses majors. 70.90

AIThe transcript becomes a public record once the claim settles, or once the statute of limitations expires without any lawsuit being filed or settlement reached.

“The transcript must be made part of the public record upon settlement of a claim under s. 70.001” bill text, line 55 →
§ 4 Exempts the resulting transcripts and recordings from records requests majors. 70.90

AISeparately from the meeting exemption, the transcripts, recordings, minutes, and records generated during the closed session are also exempt from the public records law until the release trigger is met.

“Transcripts, recordings, minutes, and records generated during an exempt meeting” bill text, line 11 →
§ 5 Requires a public announcement before the closed session moderates. 70.90

AIThe agency's attorney must first tell the agency, at a public meeting, that he or she wants to discuss the claim, before any closed-door session on it can happen.

“shall advise the agency at a public meeting that he or she desires advice concerning a claim” bill text, line 32 →
§ 6 Sets the new exemption to expire in 2031 absent reenactment technicals. 70.90

AILike other public-records and public-meetings exemptions, this one automatically sunsets in five years unless the Legislature reviews it and votes to keep it in force.

“shall stand repealed on October 2, 2031, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature” bill text, line 65 →
TIMELINE
3/4/2026
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 655 (Ch....
3/4/2026
Substituted CS/CS/HB 655 -SJ 548
3/4/2026
Read 2nd time -SJ 548
3/2/2026
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/04/26
2/25/2026
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
2/24/2026
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 21 NAYS 0
2/19/2026
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/24/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
2/18/2026
CS/CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability read 1st time
2/12/2026
Now in Rules
2/12/2026
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
2/11/2026
CS/CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
2/6/2026
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability,...
1/29/2026
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
1/28/2026
Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability
1/28/2026
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
1/27/2026
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 10 NAYS 0
1/22/2026
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/27/26, 1:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
1/13/2026
Introduced
11/17/2025
Referred to Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
11/3/2025
Filed
14 EARLIER →
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 70.90
+428 / −0
STAFF ANALYSES
2 MORE →