SESSION WATCH
Died HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. CS/CS/HB 413

Attorney Fees, Suit Money, and Costs
Send via email
SPONSOR
Judiciary Committee; Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee; Gottlieb
FILED BY
Michael Gottlieb — District 102, Democrat [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
upon becoming a law
DIED IN
Rules
PROVIDED SUMMARY

Attorney Fees, Suit Money, and Costs; Provides that award of attorney fees, suit money, & costs may be awarded retroactively & prospectively; authorizes inclusion of fees, money, & costs in award of attorney fees, suit money, & costs; authorizes court to consider whether party rejected good faith offer of settlement when awarding fees, money, & costs; authorizes court to award, deny, or reduce fees, money, & costs as sanction; requires court to make certain written findings; authorizes fees, money, & costs be paid to attorney; provides award of attorney fees & costs to nonoffending party under certain circumstances; provides relief is cumulative; authorizes court to order attorney fees, suit money, & costs in certain appellate proceedings; prohibits court from awarding fees, money, & costs to noncompliant party; provides that trial court has continuing jurisdiction to award temporary appellate fees, money, & costs; specifies primary factor for court to consider in making awards of appellate fees & costs; authorizes court to take certain actions in action involving criminal contempt.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Forces parties held in contempt to pay the other side's attorney fees.

Family court judges gain explicit power to award attorney fees retroactively and prospectively, to cover the cost of pursuing a fee award itself, and to sanction a party for vexatious or bad-faith litigation if they write specific findings.

In divorce and support enforcement cases, a party found in contempt of a court order without justification must pay the other side's reasonable court costs and attorney fees, and courts may weigh a rejected good-faith settlement offer when setting any fee award.

In paternity cases, a party who wins a civil contempt motion is presumed entitled to recover fees from the person held in contempt, regardless of that person's ability to pay.

The new rules apply only to actions, including those started by a supplemental petition, that are filed on or after the effective date, so pending cases keep the old standard.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Fees may be awarded retroactively, and for pursuing the fee award itself majors. 61.16

AICourts may award attorney fees, suit money, and costs retroactively or prospectively as equity requires, in both divorce/support and paternity cases. The fees a party spends pursuing the fee award itself can now be added to the award, on top of the underlying litigation costs.

“An award of attorney fees, suit money, and costs, whether temporary or final, may be awarded retroactively and prospectively as equity requires.” bill text, line 63 →
§ 2 Mandatory fee award against a party found in contempt majors. 61.16

AIExcept in Title IV-D cases, once a court finds a party willfully violated a family court order without proper cause, section 61.16 requires it to make written findings and order that party to pay the other side's reasonable court costs and attorney fees from the contempt proceeding.

“must order the offending party to pay reasonable court costs and attorney fees incurred by the nonoffending party” bill text, line 131 →
§ 3 New sanctions for vexatious or bad-faith litigation majors. 61.16

AIA court may award fees as a sanction against a party who, directly or through their attorney, engages in vexatious or bad-faith litigation, or may deny or reduce that party's own fee award. Any such order must include written findings identifying the specific conduct.

“If a party, directly or through the party's attorney, engages in vexatious or bad faith litigation, the court may” bill text, line 85 →
§ 4 Paternity contempt fees presumed owed regardless of ability to pay majors. 742.045

AIIn paternity cases, a party who prevails on a civil contempt motion is presumed entitled to recover attorney fees and costs from the person held in contempt, without regard to either party's financial need or the contemnor's ability to pay, a different standard than the rest of the statute uses.

“such party is entitled to recover his or her attorney fees and costs from the contemnor” bill text, line 209 →
§ 5 Rejected settlement offers now factor into fee awards moderates. 61.16

AIWhen deciding whether to award fees and how much, a court may now consider whether a party rejected a good-faith settlement offer, a factor the statute did not previously mention.

“the court may consider whether a good faith offer of settlement was rejected” bill text, line 83 →
§ 6 New fee rules apply only to cases filed after the effective date technicals. 61.16

AIAll of these changes to both statutes apply only to actions, including ones started by a supplemental petition, filed on or after the day the act becomes law, leaving pending cases governed by the prior rules.

“apply to any action, including those initiated by a supplemental petition, filed on or after the effective date of this act” bill text, line 217 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in Rules
2/10/2026
Received
2/9/2026
Referred to Rules
2/4/2026
In Messages
2/4/2026
CS passed; YEAS 110, NAYS 0
2/4/2026
Read 3rd time
2/4/2026
Added to Third Reading Calendar
2/4/2026
Read 2nd time
1/29/2026
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (2/4/2026)
1/26/2026
Added to Second Reading Calendar
1/26/2026
Bill referred to House Calendar
1/22/2026
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
1/22/2026
CS Filed
1/22/2026
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
1/22/2026
Reported out of Judiciary Committee
1/22/2026
Favorable with CS by Judiciary Committee
1/20/2026
Added to Judiciary Committee agenda
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
12/11/2025
Now in Judiciary Committee
12/11/2025
Referred to Judiciary Committee
12/10/2025
CS Filed
12/10/2025
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
12/10/2025
Reported out of Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
12/9/2025
Favorable with CS by Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
12/2/2025
Added to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee agenda
11/18/2025
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
11/18/2025
Referred to Judiciary Committee
11/18/2025
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
11/13/2025
Filed
24 EARLIER →
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 61.16
+345 / −51
s. 742.045
+502 / −10
STAFF ANALYSES