SESSION WATCH
Died SENATE · SESSION 2026

No. SB 588

Local Government Enforcement Actions
Send via email
SPONSOR
McClain
FILED BY
Stan McClain — District 9, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
10/1/2026
DIED IN
Community Affairs

Filed under Local Government.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Local Government Enforcement Actions; Prohibiting certain enforcement actions by counties, municipalities, and special districts, respectively; defining the term “enforcement action”; requiring counties, municipalities, and special districts, respectively, to establish and maintain rules; authorizing filing of legal action and providing legal remedies in certain circumstances, etc.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Lets people sue counties, cities, and special districts over arbitrary enforcement.

A new law lets anyone facing a county, municipal, or special district enforcement action -- an inspection, citation, permit denial, or similar order -- sue if a court finds the action arbitrary or unreasonable.

Before suing, the target must first request an internal review; the government has 30 days to respond in writing, and must adopt written rules for handling these requests.

Winning plaintiffs get attorney fees, up to $50,000 in damages per incident, and can get a court order stopping the government's action -- and this becomes the only legal route for such a challenge.

Anyone, including a government employee, who reports an arbitrary enforcement action in good faith is protected from retaliation under the state's whistleblower law.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Defines 'enforcement action' broadly, with no stated exclusions majors. 125.676

AICovers any decision, determination, demand, inspection, citation, order, denial, interpretation, or other regulatory action by a county, municipality, or special district or its employees -- the definition lists no exceptions for routine government functions.

“any decision, determination, demand, inspection, citation, order, denial, interpretation, or any other regulatory action” bill text, line 46 →
§ 2 New right to sue over arbitrary enforcement actions majors. 125.676

AIA county, municipality, or special district, including its employees, may not initiate or threaten an enforcement action that a court later finds arbitrary or unreasonable -- creating a private right of action reaching all three levels of local government.

“may not initiate or threaten to initiate any enforcement action that is determined to be arbitrary or unreasonable by a court of competent jurisdiction” bill text, line 43 →
§ 3 Court remedies: damages up to $50,000, fees, injunctions majors. 125.676

AIA court that finds an enforcement action arbitrary or unreasonable must award the prevailing plaintiff attorney fees and costs, may award up to $50,000 in actual damages per occurrence, and may enjoin the government from continuing the action.

“Award actual damages not to exceed $50,000 per occurrence.” bill text, line 84 →
§ 4 Becomes the exclusive channel; conflicting local rules void majors. 125.676

AIThis process becomes the sole legal avenue for challenging an arbitrary or unreasonable enforcement action, and any local ordinance or rule that conflicts with it -- including existing appeal procedures -- is void to that extent.

“This section is the sole authority for challenges to arbitrary or unreasonable enforcement actions by a county” bill text, line 97 →
§ 5 Mandatory internal review before a lawsuit moderates. 125.676

AIAnyone facing an enforcement action can demand a review; the government must respond in writing within 30 days, and must adopt standing rules for handling these review requests, or the requester may go straight to court.

“the county must review the enforcement action and send to the person or business entity making such request a written response” bill text, line 54 →
§ 6 Whistleblower protection for reporting arbitrary enforcement moderates. 125.676

AIA person or employee who reports, in good faith, an arbitrary or unreasonable enforcement action cannot be retaliated against and is covered by the state Whistle-blower's Act; a prevailing plaintiff may also file a formal whistleblower complaint.

“is not subject to retaliation and is afforded protection under the Whistle-blower's Act.” bill text, line 92 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in Community Affairs
1/13/2026
Introduced
12/9/2025
Referred to Community Affairs; Judiciary; Rules
11/19/2025
Filed
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 125.676
+582 / −0
s. 166.0413
+582 / −0
s. 189.0645
+592 / −0