SESSION WATCH
Died SENATE · SESSION 2026

No. CS/SB 636

Beach Management
Send via email
SPONSOR
Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; Leek
FILED BY
Thomas J. Leek — District 7, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
DIED IN
Calendar

Filed under Environment & Water.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Beach Management; Requiring the Department of Environmental Protection to review certain data when designating certain beaches as critically eroded and in need of restoration and nourishment; requiring that certain beaches, whose local government preserved funds for a certain purpose and which possess specified features, be designated as critically eroded; revising the list of areas that may receive designation as an area of critical state concern, etc.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Requires critical-erosion designation for beaches meeting new criteria.

A beach whose local government has a funding plan, a shoreline-maintenance easement, and specific flooding-prone geology must now be designated critically eroded, unlocking eligibility for up to 75 percent state-funded restoration.

Before designating any beach as critically eroded, the department must now review whether it has been repeatedly repaired using private, local, or federal money to hold back erosion.

The department's secretary can now require coastal local governments to write strategic beach management plans covering flooding risk, property values, sensitive lands, and engineering recommendations; those plans count toward state funding decisions.

Low-lying land behind the dune system that keeps flooding from stormwater backflow, or that has sat under a long local emergency declaration, can now be designated an area of critical state concern.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Mandatory critically-eroded designation for qualifying beaches majors. 161.101

AIA beach is automatically designated critically eroded -- no departmental discretion involved -- if its local government has a funding plan for the state strategic beach management plan and holds a qualifying shoreline-maintenance easement over land with the specified flood-prone geology.

“ensures the preservation of funding for inclusion in the state strategic beach management plan, such beach must be designated as critically eroded” bill text, line 55 →
§ 2 Secretary can compel local strategic beach management plans majors. 161.101

AIThe department's secretary gains new authority to require any coastal local government to write a local strategic beach management plan covering flooding risk, property values, sensitive lands and waters, and coastal-engineering recommendations.

“may, as he or she deems necessary, require coastal local governments to develop local strategic beach management plans” bill text, line 75 →
§ 3 New land category eligible for critical-state-concern designation majors. 380.05

AILow-lying land just inland of the beach-dune system that has been repeatedly breached or overtopped by seawater entering the stormwater system becomes newly eligible for designation as an area of critical state concern, a stricter state land-use status.

“low elevation sections immediately inland of the beach-dune system which have been repeatedly breached or overtopped by seawater flowing into an interconnected stormwater system” bill text, line 123 →
§ 4 Department must review repair and funding history before designation moderates. 161.101

AIBefore designating any beach as critically eroded, the department must now review data on whether that beach has been repeatedly and preemptively repaired using private, local, or federal money to hold back erosion.

“the department shall review data related to beaches that have been preemptively and repeatedly repaired to avoid complete erosion” bill text, line 48 →
§ 5 Local strategic plans now count toward state funding decisions moderates. 161.161

AIThe new local strategic beach management plans are folded into the state's planning process, and the requirement that only regional-level plans serve as the basis for state funding decisions is dropped so local plans count too.

“including plans developed pursuant to s. 161.101(2)(b), taking into account areas of greatest need and probable federal and local funding” bill text, line 103 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died on Calendar
2/12/2026
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
2/12/2026
Favorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 18 NAYS 0
2/10/2026
CS by Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and...
2/9/2026
On Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 02/12/26, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Building
2/9/2026
Now in Fiscal Policy
2/6/2026
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
2/4/2026
CS by Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and...
1/30/2026
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Agriculture,...
1/13/2026
Introduced
1/13/2026
Now in Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and...
1/13/2026
Favorable by Environment and Natural Resources; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
1/8/2026
On Committee agenda-- Environment and Natural Resources, 01/13/26,...
12/9/2025
Referred to Environment and Natural Resources; Appropriations...
11/20/2025
Filed
9 EARLIER →
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 161.101
+289 / −18
s. 161.161
+7 / −1
s. 380.05
+47 / −11
s. 380.05
+0 / −0
s. 380.045
+0 / −0
STAFF ANALYSES
2 MORE →