SESSION WATCH
Died HOUSE · SESSION 2026

No. HB 875

Eyewitness Identification
Send via email
SPONSOR
Koster
FILED BY
Traci Koster — District 66, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
7/1/2026
DIED IN
Criminal Justice Subcommittee
PROVIDED SUMMARY

Eyewitness Identification; Revises eyewitness identification procedures; requires documentation of eyewitness's description of possible perpetrator of crime; requires officers to have evidence-based reason to include person in lineup; limits use of facial recognition technology in certain circumstances; specifies composition of lineup; limits number of identification procedures that may be conducted as to certain persons; specifies that lineups are preferable to show-ups or first-time-in-court identifications; specifies circumstances in which show-up or in-court identification may be performed; specifies that instructions must be given to eyewitness before any identification procedure; revises such instructions; requires lineup administrator to document any identification or nonidentification in specified manner; requires audio & video recording of identification procedure; provides exception; provides that certain attorneys may be present at identification procedure; specifies permissible conduct of such attorneys during procedure.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Forces police to document, record, and limit eyewitness identifications.

Florida law enforcement agencies must now follow detailed rules before showing a witness a lineup, including writing down the witness's initial description and requiring an evidence-based reason to include any suspect.

If facial recognition technology identified the suspect, police need an independent reason to run a lineup. The software match alone is not enough.

Lineups are now preferred over street show-ups, which are limited to emergencies near the crime scene. The same eyewitness and suspect can only go through one identification procedure, ever.

Every identification procedure must be recorded on video or, if that is not possible, audio. Both the defense and prosecution's attorneys may silently watch.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 Requires an independent basis before a facial-recognition match majors. 92.70

AIIf facial recognition technology identified a suspect, police may not run a lineup based on that match alone. They need a separate, independent basis to believe the suspect committed the crime before including that person in a lineup.

“a law enforcement officer or agency may not conduct a lineup unless there is a basis, independent of the use of facial recognition technology” bill text, line 107 →
§ 2 Requires an evidence-based reason to put anyone in a lineup majors. 92.70

AIBefore a suspect can be placed in any lineup, the officer or agency must already have an evidence-based reason to believe that person committed the crime under investigation, so a lineup can no longer be used as a fishing expedition.

“a law enforcement officer or agency must have an evidence-based reason to believe that such suspect committed the crime under investigation.” bill text, line 104 →
§ 3 Caps identification procedures at one per eyewitness and suspect majors. 92.70

AIOnce an eyewitness has gone through an identification procedure involving a given suspect, that same pairing cannot be tested again through another lineup, photo array, or show-up.

“Only one identification procedure involving the same eyewitness and suspect may be conducted.” bill text, line 133 →
§ 4 Restricts show-ups to genuine emergencies near the crime scene majors. 92.70

AIShow-ups, meaning presenting a witness with a single suspect, may only be used with a live suspect in exigent circumstances requiring immediate display close to the time and place of the crime. Lineups are otherwise required.

“Show-ups may only be performed using a live suspect and only in exigent circumstances that require the immediate display of a suspect” bill text, line 138 →
§ 5 Requires a good reason before a first-time in-court identification moderates. 92.70

AIA witness may not identify a defendant for the first time in the courtroom unless the prosecutor gives a good reason for skipping an out-of-court identification procedure beforehand.

“An eyewitness may not identify the defendant for the first time in court unless the prosecutor provides a good reason” bill text, line 147 →
§ 6 Bars eyewitnesses from discussing the identification with others or media moderates. 92.70

AIAfter taking part in an identification procedure, an eyewitness may not discuss the procedure or its results with other eyewitnesses in the same investigation, and may not speak to the media about it.

“The eyewitness may not discuss the identification procedure or results with any other eyewitnesses involved in the investigation” bill text, line 172 →
§ 7 Requires officers to record a witness's description before any procedure moderates. 92.70

AIBefore any identification procedure, an officer must write down the eyewitness's own description of the perpetrator and the conditions under which the witness observed them, including lighting, distance, and any impairments.

“a law enforcement officer shall record as complete a description as possible of the perpetrator of a crime, provided by the eyewitness” bill text, line 94 →
§ 8 Mandates audio and video recording of identification procedures moderates. 92.70

AIEvery identification procedure must be captured on video; if video is not available, an audio recording alone will do. This creates a permanent record of how each identification was conducted.

“All identification procedures shall be captured by audio and video recording unless visual recording is unavailable” bill text, line 191 →
TIMELINE
3/13/2026
Died in Criminal Justice Subcommittee
1/13/2026
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
1/5/2026
Now in Criminal Justice Subcommittee
1/5/2026
Referred to Judiciary Committee
1/5/2026
Referred to Criminal Justice Subcommittee
12/23/2025
Filed
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 92.70
+881 / −3