SESSION WATCH
Died SENATE · SESSION 2026

No. SB 944

Causes of Action Based on Improvements to Real Property
Send via email
SPONSOR
McClain
FILED BY
Stan McClain — District 9, Republican [search donations]
EFFECTIVE
Upon becoming a law

Filed under Legal.

PROVIDED SUMMARY

Causes of Action Based on Improvements to Real Property; Revising the time in which an action founded on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property shall be commenced; revising the date on which the statute of limitations period for such action begins; revising the latest date by which an action shall be commenced, etc.

Full bill text →

Plain English Summary

AI-GENERATED
Shortens the time to sue a professional who exits a project early.

A lawsuit over a defect in the design, planning, or construction of a building must start within 4 years, and never more than 7, of a trigger date. That date is currently one project-wide event.

This bill lets the clock start instead from the date a specific architect, engineer, surveyor, or contractor's own contract with their employer ends early, if that professional abandoned the work or was terminated.

It also defines, for the first time, what counts as 'completion' for a road or bridge project built under chapters 334-349: the date of final acceptance under a separate transportation statute.

A separate new definition sets a contractor's own 'completion of the contract' as the later of finishing the work or the date final payment comes due, regardless of when payment actually arrives.

KEY PROVISIONS
§ 1 New early-exit trigger for a professional's own deadline majors. 95.11(3)(b)

AIThe 4-year clock for suing over a construction defect can now start from the date a specific architect, engineer, surveyor, or contractor's own contract with their employer ends, instead of only from the project's completion.

“The date of termination of the contract between the architect, landscape architect, interior designer, engineer, surveyor and mapper, or licensed contractor” bill text, line 28 →
§ 2 New trigger applies only to the professional who exited majors. 95.11(3)(b)

AIThis early-exit trigger is limited to the specific architect, engineer, surveyor, or contractor who abandoned the work or whose own contract was terminated; it does not move up the clock for other parties still on the project.

“only as to the architect, landscape architect, interior designer, engineer, surveyor and mapper, or licensed contractor who has abandoned construction” bill text, line 31 →
§ 3 Same earliest-of-four rule now governs the 7-year outer deadline majors. 95.11(3)(b)

AIThe absolute 7-year deadline to sue, which applies even to a defect nobody could have discovered sooner, is recalculated using the same set of dates, including a professional's own early contract termination, rather than only project completion or abandonment.

“the action must be commenced within 7 years after the earliest date of” bill text, line 47 →
§ 4 New completion trigger for road and transportation projects moderates. 95.11(3)(b)

AIFor projects built under the state's transportation statutes, 'completion of the improvement' is now the date of final acceptance defined in a separate transportation statute, giving those projects a specific completion trigger they lacked before.

“For an improvement made pursuant to chapters 334-349, final acceptance, as defined in s. 337.185(2)(c)” bill text, line 79 →
§ 5 A contractor's own contract completion defined by payment due date moderates. 95.11(3)(b)

AIWhen none of the other triggers apply, a professional's own contract is deemed complete on whichever is later: the date all contracted services were finished, or the date final payment on those services became due.

“the later of the date of final performance of all the contracted services or the date that final payment for such services becomes due” bill text, line 82 →
TIMELINE
12/18/2025
Withdrawn prior to introduction
12/17/2025
Filed
STATUTES IT CHANGES
s. 95.11
+374 / −72